Unions criticize Obama over his embrace of Wall Street
Obama Tilt Toward Rubinomics Stirs Warning From Organized Labor
AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka delivers a slap at former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin in a slide show exhorting union members to back Democrat Barack Obama for president.
Blaming unfettered global trade and inadequate government regulation for lost manufacturing jobs and a staggering economy, Trumka's presentation cautions that ``it will do us little good if, when the next Democrat moves into the White House, Wall Street takes command of our country's economic policy.''
Trumka leaves no doubt that the rebuke is aimed at Rubin, Wall Street's most prominent Democrat. It's ``hard to tell the difference'' between Rubin and Republican Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, the presentation says. Trumka's critique reflects the concern among organized-labor officials that Rubin and like- minded Democrats may win the behind-the-scenes battle to shape Obama's economic thinking.
``I'm hearing Rubin's name more and more associated with the campaign's economic policy,'' says James Torrey, a top Obama fundraiser and chief executive officer of New York-based Torrey Associates LLC, a hedge-fund investor.
Rubin, who became chairman of Citigroup Inc.'s executive committee after leaving President Bill Clinton's Cabinet, represents policy priorities that would favor free trade and more emphasis on deficit-cutting budget discipline if Obama beats Republican John McCain on Nov. 4. Meanwhile, Trumka and his boss, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, are pushing trade policies that would protect U.S. industries, universal health care, and spending on highway construction and other projects that would create union jobs.
Growth and Fairness
Rubin, in an interview, says Obama isn't favoring either faction's agenda. ``Very much as President Clinton did, he's focusing on both competitiveness and growth on the one hand, and distribution and fairness on the other,'' he says. ``It seems to me that's where he ought to be.''
Still, the Wall Street contingent's clout has grown within the Obama camp in the two months since Rubin's first-choice candidate, New York Senator Hillary Clinton, conceded the nomination.
A Rubin protege, Jason Furman, is now the economic-policy director of Obama's campaign.
Valerie Jarrett, one of Obama's closest friends and confidantes, attended a meeting hosted by Rubin, 69, several weeks ago and says they've talked by telephone several times.
Outnumbered at Forum
At an economic forum last month, Sweeney, former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, and union advocates were outnumbered by the likes of Lawrence Summers, Rubin's successor as Treasury secretary; JPMorgan Chase & Co. CEO Jamie Dimon; former Republican Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill; and former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman William Donaldson, like O'Neill an appointee of President George W. Bush.
``Senator Obama made it clear that he would be reaching out to members of that group in the future,'' says another participant, Laura Tyson, who worked with Rubin as the head of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.
Labor's apprehensions surfaced after the June 9 appointment of Furman, a Brookings Institution scholar and former Clinton White House aide. One reason: In 2005, Furman published a paper saying Wal-Mart Stores Inc. creates productivity gains and consumer savings that outweigh the low wages it pays workers.
`Very Strong Ideas'
Furman, who turns 38 today, disputes the notion that any faction holds sway. ``Barack Obama is somebody who has very strong ideas about economics,'' he says. ``And no one, not Bob Rubin, not Bob Reich, not Rich Trumka, is going to walk into a room and change his fundamental, underlying priorities.''
Even so, some union leaders are already girding to fight for influence in any future Obama administration. If the Rubin camp were to win out, it would boost the odds that an Obama presidency might sidestep significant trade restrictions and sacrifice spending programs for the sake of deficit reduction.
``I worry about his influence,'' says Leo Gerard, president of the United Steelworkers.
Trumka, 59, says the AFL-CIO began months ago to look for candidates for Cabinet posts, including the Treasury and Energy Departments, as well as the Federal Reserve.
``This will not be business as usual for us,'' Trumka says in an interview. ``They're not going to be able to pat us on the head and say, we'll let you give us three names for the secretary of labor, and think that we'll be happy.''
Getting Out the Vote
Obama, 47, can't afford to alienate organized labor. Union households account for almost one in four U.S. voters, and labor is crucial to turning out the vote. The 10.5 million-member AFL- CIO, the nation's largest labor organization, plans to use 250,000 volunteers to contact 13 million voters in 24 states; the Steelworkers plan to deploy 250 paid election workers across 27 states.
One of Obama's biggest challenges, in fact, may be winning a significant share of rank-and-file union voters, who backed Clinton by large margins in Ohio and other industrial swing states.
So far, Obama's economic promises satisfy most union goals. The Illinois senator has said he would reopen the North American Free Trade Agreement. He backs universal health-care coverage, middle-class tax cuts and spending for infrastructure and education.
``I'm very comfortable with the way Senator Obama personally has laid out his agenda,'' Gerard says.
Radio Ad
Obama's rhetoric has often veered toward protectionism. A radio commercial in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania says McCain appeared at a Sturgis, South Dakota, motorcycle rally after opposing rules that would make the government buy vehicles from U.S. manufacturers such as Milwaukee-based Harley-Davidson Inc.
``It's time to hear the roar of a strong American economy again -- and stop John McCain from shipping our jobs overseas,'' the ad says.
After criticizing Nafta while stumping for primary votes in states that have lost manufacturing jobs, Obama rarely brings up the trade deal since claiming the nomination. He told reporters on June 20 that ``there was some overheated rhetoric'' about trade during the primaries, while reiterating his opposition to Nafta.
Since Rubin began advising the campaign, Obama and his team are also talking more about deficit reduction, a Rubin priority that may threaten union-backed spending programs.
Strong Dollar
At an Aug. 5 town hall meeting in Berea, Ohio, Obama touted the benefits of a strong dollar, a cause Rubin championed at the Treasury. ``A strengthening of the dollar'' would mitigate rising gasoline prices, he said.
The statement appalled economists aligned with unions, which fear that a stronger dollar would make imported goods cheaper and hurt export sales. ``The strong-dollar policy is very harmful,'' says Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington. ``There's some real fundamental differences between the Rubinites and the labor people, and I don't know how you get them on the same page.''
Obama seems to be trying. Last month, he told reporters that, while he planned to cut the deficit, ``it is important for us to make some critical investments right now in America's families.'' In an Aug. 9 radio speech, he mentioned the budget deficit, then pledged to close tax loopholes that he said encourage companies to move jobs overseas.
In the end, the competition for influence between laborites and Rubinites may actually prove politically helpful, says Charlie Cook, editor of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.
``What you need is two loud voices in the room to keep Obama down the middle, which is where he needs to be to get elected,'' Cook says.















High-level politicians, including Barack Obama, are in quest of limiting the American peoples’ access to on-demand, short term financial support. A number of cities and townships are attempting to enforce limitations on where these lawful businesses can operate. Still worse, is that several states, including Georgia and North Carolina, have effectively forced all-out bans on the trade, with several more trying to follow suit. Citizens all around the nation are looking to have their voices paid attention to by aggressive legislation that would eradicate the payday loan industry nationwide; Obama, and other mislead political officials, are pushing for an absolute ban in the name of personal political gain, in spite of the hundreds of thousands of eventual lost jobs in an already difficult economy. Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store Professional Blogging Team Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406 Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/
One of the biggest targets for politicians, as far as economics are concerned, is becoming the payday loan industry. Governors across the country are trying to rid their states of the industry altogether, and so far, Georgia, North Carolina, and Oregon have succeeded. The result was that bankruptcies, foreclosures, and also the number of overdraft fees due to bouncing checks went through the roof, which doesn’t do anything for the citizens afflicted in these turbulent times, and only is really good for the banking industry. Despite these negative effects, other states are looking to follow the example and do the same. Even at the national level, presidential candidate Barack Obama, is weighing in his own agenda on the issue, and advancing his own intentions on getting rid of the industry in the United States completely. If these measures, both on state levels and nationally, are successful, the results are going to be increased unemployment, more debt, more foreclosures, and an even worse economy. Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store Professional Blogging Team Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406 Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/
I think we have different opinions about his issue and lets just hope that our new leader will do his duties well in order to save our economy from the crisis that we are experiencing nowadays. I wonder if Treasury Secretary Nominee Timothy Geithner needed a payday loan to repay the $42,000 he owed the IRS. See, it seems the likely next head of the United States Treasury messed up on his taxes. From 2001-2004 he worked for the International Monetary Fund, and apparently U.S. tax law mixed with working for an international company was too complicated for Geithner. Good thing getting a payday loan is nice and simple. Obama and his team are defending the nominee, saying the errors were an honest mistake and Geithner is the right person to head the Treasury in this time of financial crisis. Well, I certainly believe it is possible that he has learned a lot in the five years since he messed up his taxes. And he did pay back the money he owed plus interest. Still, I am hesitant about putting a man who couldn’t even get his own taxes right in charge of the entire country’s finances. You can share your thoughts on the situation at your payday loan source.
The problem with unions is that they want to make wages and benefits so high that the company that employs their workers can't afford to continue to operate. The problem with the people who own the companies don't want to pay their workers very much and keep all the profits to themselves. The problem with protectionism is that the US manufacturing base is so depleted that it just can't afford to compete on the world stage, and at this point it might be too far gone in order to re-attain that position. Granted, we used to manufacture 1/4 of the worlds' goods, and they were quality, and a lot of people bought them. There has to be a balance that can be maintained between outsourcing, domestic industry, and global impact. If the US were to all of a sudden begin manufacturing its own goods, the cost of labor would make purchasing those products prohibitive. Why do you think GM has bled cash for the last decade or so? It's because the UAW, unfortunately and I am a union supporter, has made employing workers too costly for the company, and also supplying the benefits to retirees. Same with Chrysler. Ford made ground by being smarter and having more competitive products, like the Ranger, which is competitive with light trucks by Nissan and Toyota by having similar quality, performance, and gas mileage, and similar price. The GM equivalent prices almost $4,000 higher - why do it? Also, the flagship cars of the Big 3 don't have mileage nearly as good as the Camry or Civic, and are more expensive. Something drastic is going to have to change.
Trumka leaves no doubt that the rebuke is aimed at Rubin, Wall Street's a large number of prominent Democrat. It's "hard to inform the difference" between Rubin and Republican Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, the presentation says. Trumka's critique reflects the concern among organized-labor officials that Rubin and like- minded Democrats may win the behind-the-scenes battle to order Obama's economic thinking. Trumka and his boss, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, are pushing trade policies that would protect U.S. industries, universal health care, and spending on highway construction and other projects that would create union jobs. Vancouver payday loans
Trumka leaves no doubt that the rebuke is aimed at Rubin, Wall Street's a large number of prominent Democrat. It's "hard to inform the difference" between Rubin and Republican Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, the presentation says. Trumka's critique reflects the concern among organized-labor officials that Rubin and like- minded Democrats may win the behind-the-scenes battle to order Obama's economic thinking. Trumka and his boss, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, are pushing trade policies that would protect U.S. industries, universal health care, and spending on highway construction and other projects that would create union jobs. British Columbia payday loans
The problem with the people who own the companies don't want to pay their workers very much and keep all the profits to themselves. The problem with protectionism is that the US manufacturing base is so depleted that it just can't afford to compete on the world stage, and at this point it might be too far gone in order to re-attain that position. Granted, we used to manufacture 1/4 of the worlds' goods, and they were quality, and a lot of people bought them. anunturi